Piers Morgan slams Meghan and Harry's 17 untruths and exaggerations

 told Tucker Carlson that 17 claims made by and in their bombshell Oprah interview have since been proved to be false, exaggerated or are unverifiable.

Morgan, DailyMail.com’s editor-at-large, sat down for his own tell-all with host Carlson, where he renewed his fierce criticisms of Harry and Meghan and said the duchess is ‘delusional’. 

‘Seventeen different claims by the pair of them have now been proven to be either completely untrue, or massively exaggerated, or unprovable,’ he said.’I don’t understand why I should have to believe people who are not telling the truth.   

‘There are so many ridiculous whoppers in this interview that frankly in the end, saying I believe her would be like saying I believe Pinocchio.Why would I?’ 

Morgan did not specify what the 17 claims were. However this is a breakdown of the couple’s allegations in the Oprah interview and doubts over them that have since arisen.

Piers Morgan on Monday said he was right not to believe 'delusional duchess' Meghan Markle and Prince Harry in their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey because 17 of their claims have since been proven false, exaggerated or unverifiable

Piers Morgan on Monday said he was right not to believe ‘delusional duchess’ Meghan Markle and Prince Harry in their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey because 17 of their claims have since been proven false, exaggerated or unverifiable

'Seventeen different claims by the pair of them have now been proven to be either completely untrue, or massively exaggerated, or unprovable,' Morgan said of the couple's Oprah interview

‘Seventeen different claims by the pair of them have now been proven to be either completely untrue, or massively exaggerated, or unprovable,’ Morgan said of the couple’s Oprah interview

Harry and Meghan made at least 17 claims in their Oprah interview which can be categorized as either disproven, exaggerated or unverifiable

Harry and Meghan made at least 17 claims in their Oprah interview which can be categorized as either disproven, exaggerated or unverifiable


Harry and Meghan were actually secretly wed three days before the Windsor ceremony by the Archbishop of Canterbury 

Meghan said: ‘You know, three days before our wedding, we got married.No one knows that… We called the Archbishop and we just said, ‘Look, this thing, this spectacle is for the world but we want our union between us.’  

Just two weeks after the Oprah interview aired, Harry and Meghan admitted they did not get married three days before the Royal wedding after an official certificate blew their claim apart.

The Duke and  confessed the ceremony with the Archbishop of Canterbury in Kensington Palace saw them just ‘privately exchange personal vows’.

It came after the General Register Office revealed the couple’s wedding certificate for the first time – which showed they did get married on May 19, 2018 in the lavish, £32million taxpayer-funded ceremony at Windsor Castle after all.

The official who drew up the license said Meghan is ‘obviously confused’ and ‘clearly misinformed’ over the wedding when she made her comments to Oprah. 

The Archbishop of Canterbury has also rejected the couple’s claim that they married at a secret ceremony before the Windsor Castle wedding.

He said: ‘The legal wedding was on the Saturday.I signed the wedding certificate, which is a legal document, and I would have committed a serious criminal offence if I signed it knowing it was false.’ 

Among the disproven claims was Meghan's story about marrying Harry three days before their official wedding at Windsor Palace in May 2018

Among the disproven claims was Meghan’s story about marrying Harry three days before their official wedding at Windsor Palace in May 2018 

Archie has a birthright to be a prince

Meghan said: ‘Idea of the first member of color in this family, not being titled in the same way that other grandchildren would be…It’s not their right to take it away’  

Archie did not have a birthright to be a prince, but is set to become one when Charles accedes to the throne.  

William and Kate’s children have the HRH title and are styled as prince and princesses – and Archie is not – because of a ruling more than 100 years ago.

In 1917, King George V issued a written order that only royal offspring who are in the direct line of succession could be made a prince and receive HRH titles.

The Letters Patent read: ‘…the grandchildren of the sons of any such sovereign in the direct male line (save only the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales) shall have and enjoy in all occasions the style and title enjoyed by the children of dukes of these our realms.’

Under the rules, only Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge’s eldest son Prince George – as a great-grandson of the monarch down the direct line of succession to the throne – was originally entitled to be a prince.

The Queen stepped in ahead of George’s birth in 2013 to issue a Letters Patent to ensure all George’s siblings – as the children of future monarch William – would have fitting titles, meaning they were extended to Charles and Louis.

Under the George V rules, Archie would be entitled to be an HRH or a prince when his grandfather Charles, the Prince of Wales, accedes to the throne.  

Archie wouldn’t get 24/7 security because he wasn’t a prince

Meghan said: ‘In those months when I was pregnant, all around this same time, so we (had) the conversation of he won’t be given security, he’s not going to be given a title.’

Being a prince does not automatically entitle royals to police protection. 

Those who do have full 24/7 security include, the Queen, Prince Philip, Prince William, Kate, Prince Charles and Camilla. 

Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie have no official protection, nor does Prince Andrew. 

The British government’s Royal and VIP Executive Committee authorises the budget for security for royals, VIPs and former PMs.

The Home Office’s control over it means the Queen does not have the right to dish out protection.  

Harry and Meghan no longer receive British police protection, and are understood to be paying for private security. 

The couple’s friends have described the cost of their bodyguards as ‘exorbitant.’ 

The Sussexes are understood to have lost their round-the-clock police protection after they announced they were stepping down as working royals.

During their chat with Oprah, Harry said that when they were in Canada he was told ‘at short notice security was going to be removed.’ 

They had taxpayer funded police protection while they were in Canada and were escorted from Canada to California last March by UK police, before the officers were summoned back to London.

A former senior Metropolitan Police officer said at the time, the decision to remove protection was made by senior police and Home Office staff after consultation with the Palace. 

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex introduce their baby son Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor during a photocall in St George’s Hall at Windsor Castle in May 2019

Meghan has not seen Samantha Markle in almost 20 years

Meghan said: ‘The last time I saw her must have been at least 18, 19 years.’  

During the interview Meghan distanced herself from her half-sister Samantha, who she said she hardly knows and she grew up ‘an only child’.

A photograph from 2008 – 13 years ago – shows Meghan with Samantha at her graduation. 

Samantha last night slammed the royal’s interview with Oprah Winfrey, saying ‘the truth was totally ignored and omitted’ while providing photos and documents to disprove each of the Duchess of Sussex’s claims about her.

The pregnant Duchess of Sussex told Oprah, 67, that Samantha ‘doesn’t know’ her, claiming she was raised as ‘an only child’ – but her half-sister has now insisted that couldn’t be further from the truth.  

‘I don’t know how she can say I don’t know her and she was an only child.We’ve got photographs over a lifespan of us together. So how can she not know me?’ she told , while sharing images of the two women together at different stages throughout their lives – most recently in 2008, just 13 years ago.

The Duchess also claimed that Samantha only changed her surname back to Markle after Meghan struck up a romance with Harry – but Samantha insisted that this claim was wholly inaccurate, and shared further evidence to refute it.  

Newspaper held story about Thomas Markle until Sunday before Meghan’s wedding

Meghan: ‘If we were going to use the word betrayal, it’s because when I asked him, when we were told by the comms team, this is a story that was going to be coming out, which, by the way, the tabloids had apparently known for a month or so and decided to hold until the Sunday before our wedding because they wanted to create drama, which is also a really key point in all this.’

Meghan claimed ‘the tabloids had apparently known for a month’ that Thomas Markle had staged paparazzi photos before the wedding but ‘decided to hold till the Sunday before our wedding…to create drama,’ adding: ‘They did not report the news, they created the news.’ She suggested she had ‘lost’ her father forever as a result. 

In truth, far from sitting on the paparazzi story, the Mail on Sunday, which broke it, published within 24 hours of getting the proof.

A photograph from 2008 - 13 years ago - shows Meghan with her half-sister Samantha Markle at her graduation

A photograph from 2008 – 13 years ago – shows Meghan with her half-sister Samantha Markle at her graduation


‘I was silenced’

Meghan said she was ‘silenced’ by the institution.

‘Everyone in my world was given very clear directive, from the moment the world knew Harry and I were dating, to say ‘No comment,” Meghan told Oprah.

On the day they announced their engagement, Meghan and Harry gave a lengthy interview to the BBC’s Mishal Husain, although the Duchess reportedly complained afterwards that the journalist had not been ‘warm enough’. 

On their tour of South Africa, they granted interviews to ITN’s Tom Bradby, when Meghan memorably told him: ‘Not many people have asked if I’m OK.’ 

During the interview, Meghan described how life in the royal spotlight had been a struggle, particularly during her pregnancy and after Archie’s birth.

She told Bradby: ‘Look, any woman especially when they are pregnant, you’re really vulnerable and so that was made really challenging.

‘And then when you have a newborn – you know.And especially as a woman, it’s a lot.

‘So you add this on top of just trying to be a new mum or trying to be a newlywed.

‘And, also thank you for asking, because not many people have asked if I’m OK.But it’s a very real thing to be going through behind the scenes.’

Royal insiders have stressed that it was very much the case that Harry and Meghan themselves ‘called the shots’ when it came to publicity, deciding which charities to support, which engagements to go on, and which media to grant interviews to.  

Meghan was also given high-profile solo responsibilities by the Queen, including to succeed Her Majesty as the patron of the National Theatre, which seemed an ideal fit given Meghan’s background as an actress.   

As well as her patronage of the National Theatre, she was an ambassador for the Association of Commonwealth Universities, animal wellbeing charity Mayhew, and fashion charity Smart Works.   

The patronages involved highly-publicised visits to the charities where she used her platform to advance their various causes.

After stepping down as a senior royal, Meghan lost her royal patronages for the National Theatre and the Association of Commonwealth Universities. 

Meghan never researched the Royal Family prior to joining

Meghan said: ‘I didn’t do any research about what that would mean,’ she said.’I never looked up my husband online.’ 

Meghan’s claim that she never researched Harry, nor the Royal Family, before entering into the relationship is at odds with claims made in the couple’s biography.

Although the Sussexes maintain they did not contribute to Finding Freedom, it was written by friendly journalists Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand, who say the book was impeccably well-sourced by those closest to the couple.

Prior to their first date at Dean Street Townhouse in 2016, the authors write: ‘Naturally both participants in this blind date did their homework with a thorough Google search.Harry, who scoped out Meghan on social media, was interested.’

A friend is also claimed to have impressed on Meghan the attention she would command for dating Harry, saying: ‘This could be crazy…you will be the most wanted woman’.

The duchess said she ‘didn’t do any research’ into the monarchy, ‘didn’t fully understand what the job was’, and did not grow up ‘knowing much about the Royal Family’. 

Friends of the duchess have painted a different picture, revealing that she was fascinated by the royals in her youth.Ninaki Priddy, who was Meghan’s maid of honour at her first wedding to Trevor Engelson, said her friend was ‘always fascinated by the Royal Family. She wants to be Princess Diana 2.0’.

She added: ‘She had one of Princess Diana’s books [Diana: Her True Story] on her bookshelf, and even when she was with Trevor she told me she wanted to go and stay in London for at least a month.I know she used to love The Princess Diaries films.’

The mother of Suzy Ardakani, one of the duchess’s high school friends, has described how she taped Diana’s wedding and would watch it with her daughter and Meghan years later.

Harry was financially cut off from the royals 

Harry said: ‘My family literally cut me off financially, and I had to afford security for us’ 

When Harry and Meghan announced their intention to step back from being senior royals, they said they wanted to be ‘financially independent’.

Before cutting ties, Prince Charles had given the couple around £2.5 million a year through his private estate the Duchy of Cornwall. 

The Queen also supported the couple through the Duchy of Lancaster, according to accounts.

Another 5 per cent of their income was made up by the taxpayer through the Sovereign Grant.  

Large renovations to the couple’s Frogmore Cottage residence at Windsor worth £2.4 million were also paid for by the taxpayer-funded grant. 

Harry later paid back the cost of refurbishing the property near Windsor Castle. 

Harry inherited around £7 million left to him by Diana, Princess of Wales, who died in 1997.

He also inherited £3 million left to him by his great-grandmother in 2003.

Meghan brought an estimated £3 million to their marriage earned in her career as an actress. 

Since leaving the UK, the couple have signed deals with streaming services Spotify and Netflix which are thought to be worth more than £100 million.

The couple now live in a £10 million mansion in Montecito, California.

‘Betrayal’ by father who staged photos  

Meghan said the Press ‘created’ news about Meghan’s father ‘to create drama’ 

The Duchess told Oprah that she had been deeply hurt by her father Thomas and that she and Harry had tried to help her father before he ‘betrayed’ her. 

However, Thomas has claimed in multiple interviews, both before and after the Oprah claims, that he has gone out of his way to try and repair his relationship with Meghan.

Meghan told Oprah: ‘I look at Archie [and] I genuinely can’t imagine doing anything to intentionally cause pain to my child.’

She said that she had called her father after photos were released of him prior to her wedding in 2018.

Meghan said: ‘We called my dad and I asked him [about staging the photos] he said, “No, absolutely not.”‘

She added: ‘I said, “I just need you to tell me and if you tell me the truth, we can help,” and he wasn’t able to do that. And that, for me, has really resonated, especially now as a mother.’ 

Thomas denied the claims after the interview, telling Good Morning Britain that he had apologized ‘100 times’ for doing the deal with the paparazzi before the wedding. 

‘The biggest problem here is she’s pretty much ghosted all of her family,’ Thomas said.  

Thomas said that while he did let her down, she had ‘let me down too’ by cutting him off after heart surgery almost three years ago.

He said: ‘The bottom line is she didn’t lose me, she made a statement saying she lost me, she didn’t lose me, I would’ve always been there for her, I’m there for her now if she wants me.’

Thomas also made a pointed dig at Harry, telling GMB: ‘We all make mistakes – but I’ve never played naked pool or dressed like Hitler like Harry did.’

He was referencing Harry’s trip to Las Vegas where he stripped off in a hotel to play pool in 2012 and a party seven years prior, when he was 20, when the prince wore a Nazi uniform. 

Describing their last conversation before the couple’s wedding, Thomas said the couple rejected him when he was lying on a hospital bed. 

‘I also feel she let me down as well because I was in a hospital bed the last time we talked and I never heard from them again. They didn’t care if I died,’ Thomas said last month.

But Thomas also used the interview to once again urge his daughter to get in touch with him.

He said: ‘I’d like to say again. I’m sorry for what I’ve done.This was two years ago. But I’ve tried to make it up to her. I’m now only 70 miles away. I’ve never stopped loving her. I don’t agree with all the things that my children they do. But I will always love them. And I certainly love Meghan.’


Help for mental anguish   

Meghan says she begged in vain for the Palace to help her mental state 

Feeling that she ‘just didn’t want to be alive any more’ in January 2019, Meghan said she ‘went to the institution, and I said that I needed to go somewhere to get help’, but was refused because it ‘wouldn’t be good for the institution’. 

The duchess claimed: ‘I went to human resources, and I said, ‘I just really – I need help’,’ but HR could not do anything because she was not a paid member of staff.She longed to check herself into a hospital or similar clinic but ‘you can’t just do that… I couldn’t, you know, call an Uber to the Palace’.

Meghan was not asked by Oprah why she went to HR rather than simply ask her GP to make a referral or seek advice from a mental health clinician herself, in the same way she might have done for any other ailment.

One insider pointed out that HR exists for Palace employees while the royals themselves have a private office to help arrange everything from booking a holiday to fixing a medical appointment. 

Harry, meanwhile, said he was ashamed of admitting to his family that Meghan needed help, and so he did not talk to them. 

The duke, who is passionate about the mental health campaign he launched, called Heads Together, and has himself sought therapy in the past, said that with his wife he ‘had no idea what to do’.

Couple witnessed racism inside the monarchy 

Meghan said: [There were] concerns and conversations about How Much Does Booking A Private Jet Cost dark his [Archie’s] skin might be when he’s born’  

Harry and Meghan refused to identify the close relative who made the comment because it would be ‘too damaging to them’. 

However, Oprah later revealed that Harry had confirmed it was neither the Queen nor Prince Philip, leaving only a handful of royals for the allegation to fall upon, including the Prince of Wales and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, as well as the Duchess of Cornwall. 

After the interview, Buckingham Palace released a rare public statement which said: ‘The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challenging the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan.

‘The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning.

‘While some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately.

‘Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved family members.’  

In the days after the interview, Prince William told reporters: ‘We’re very much not a racist family.’

It was also pointed out by various commentators, including Thomas Markle, that there may have been context attached to the ‘racist’ comment which was omitted in the couple’s narrative.

Thomas Markle told GMB after the interview: ‘I have great respect for the royals and don’t think the British royal family are racist.’

He added that ‘the whole thing about color and the baby’s skin color is bull****.’ 

Kate made Meghan cry before her wedding to Harry  

Responding to claims that she reduced Kate to tears, Meghan said: ‘No, no.The reverse happened’. 

Reports of a pre-wedding clash between the duchesses first emerged in November 2018, when sources claimed Meghan had been left displeased with a ‘stressful’ dress fitting for the flower girls. 

Accounts differed as to the source of the row.Some said it was a disagreement on whether the bridesmaids should wear tights – Meghan reportedly believed they should not.

Other reports said it stemmed from Princess Charlotte’s dress not fitting, meaning another had to be scheduled.

A source said at the time: ‘Kate had only just given birth to her third child, Prince Louis, and was feeling quite ­emotional.’ 

But during the Oprah interview Meghan flatly denied the reports and claimed it was Kate that left her upset.  

The Duchess of Cambridge with Princess Charlotte and other bridesmaids arriving at St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle for the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan in May 2018

The Duchess of Cambridge with Princess Charlotte and other bridesmaids arriving at St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle for the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan in May 2018 

Meghan had to turn over her passport, keys and driving license to royal aides

Meghan said: ‘When I joined that family, that was the last time I saw my passport, my driving license, my keys – all of that gets turned over.’ 

Senior royals are often pictured driving themselves and it is believed there have never been prior claims of a royal having keys and passports held. 

Harry and Meghan received police protection, meaning their travel was meticulously planned by officers.   

However, the couple took private jets to European holiday destinations during their time in Britain and they also travelled back-and-forth to Canada before announcing their decision to permanently step down as senior royals. 

Environment-loving Harry and Meghan stepped off private jets at airports in Ibiza and Nice just days apart in the summer of 2019.  

Meghan even jumped on a private jet to attend a lavish baby shower thrown for her by friends in New York in February 2020, which was attended by Serena Williams and Amal Clooney.  

Between November 2019 and January 2020, when the couple announced they were stepping down, the couple took three flights between Vancouver and London.

Meghan’s press team didn’t defend her when ‘things weren’t true’

Oprah asked Meghan about stories that she made Kate cry, saying: ‘So, all the time the stories were out that you had made Kate cry, you knew all along, and people around you knew that that wasn’t true.’ Meghan replied: ‘Everyone in the institution knew it wasn’t true.’ And Oprah then said: ‘So, why didn’t somebody just say that?’ Meghan said: ‘That’s a good question.’ 

Making a wider point, Mail on Sunday royal correspondent Emily Andrews has said that Meghan’s press team did in fact defend untrue stories, saying this was ‘just not right’. 

Andrews said that she interacted with a press team who defended the Sussexes ‘again and again and again, told me things were wrong – so didn’t publish – and indeed tried to stop me when true.’

Meghan Markle is seen heading to a hotel to meet up with some friends in Toronto, Canada, in November 2016

Meghan Markle is seen heading to a hotel to meet up with some friends in Toronto, Canada, in November 2016

Palace lied to protect other members of the Royal Family

Meghan said: ‘I came to understand that not only was I not being protected but that they were willing to lie to protect other members of the family, but they weren’t willing to tell the truth to protect me and my husband.’ 

There was clearly frustration felt by the couple, with some justification, towards the Palace PR machine, which was sometimes reluctant to ‘fight every little fire’, as one source put it. 

But the Palace did robustly stand ground on many other stories that the couple insisted were not true, resulting in the media not running them. 

The Palace pursued at least one national newspaper all the way to press regulator IPSO over a story about their Frogmore home, and won a decisive victory for Harry and Meghan.

The duchess complained that she was ‘not protected’, but Palace sources have hit back at the idea the duchess was left to fend for herself, suggesting it was her own aides who needed protection from her bullying ways – something she strenuously denies.

Meghan was banned from going out for lunch with her friends 

Meghan: ‘I remember so often people within The Firm would say, ‘Well, you can’t do this because it’ll look like that.

You can’t’… so, even, ‘Can I go and have lunch with my friends?’ ‘No, no, no. You’re oversaturated.

You’re everywhere. It would be best for you to not go out to lunch with your friends.’ I go, ‘Well, I haven’t left the house in months.’

Meghan appears to be talking about a four-year period, and it is likely the situation varied. 

She was spotted enjoying outings on numerous occasions, including a pub lunch with Harry, going for facials near their Kensington Palace home and shopping trips. 

Every British newspaper declined to buy photographs of these trips.No member of staff would dare tell Meghan where she could go.

When the couple decided to leave the Royal family 

Early in the Oprah interview Meghan said she joined the Royal family with the intention of devoting her life to service.Later, when asked if the Queen was ‘shocked’ by Megxit, Meghan said Harry had been talking to his grandmother about stepping down for ‘two years’. 

Harry and Meghan’s combined murky timeline of when they expressed their intention of stepping down as senior Royals left this question unanswered. 

It’s remains unclear when Harry specifically told the Queen of their plans.As to whether the Queen felt ‘blindsided’, only she could say.    

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *